Kansas Supreme Court Reverses Limon Verdict; Exclusion of Gays from Romeo & Juliet Law Violated Equal Protection
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Accommodating Outness : Hurley , Free Speech , and Gay and Lesbian Equaliiy
Unelected heads of city departments and agencies, who are in other respects (as democratic theory requires) subject to the control of the people, must, where special protection for homosexuals are [sic] concerned, be permitted to do what they please. In Romerv. Evans,2 the Supreme Court held that Amendment 2 to the Colorado constitution violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Ame...
متن کاملACCOMMODATING OUTNESS: HURLEY, FREE SPEECH, AND GAY AND LESBIAN EQUALIIY Darren
Unelected heads of city departments and agencies, who are in other respects (as democratic theory requires) subject to the control of the people, must, where special protection for homosexuals are [sic] concerned, be permitted to do what they please. In Romerv. Evans,2 the Supreme Court held that Amendment 2 to the Colorado constitution violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Ame...
متن کاملWherefore Art Thou Romeo: Revitalizing Youngberg’s Protection of Liberty for the Civilly Committed
Thirty years ago, in Youngberg v. Romeo, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized that those who are involuntarily committed in a state institution enjoy a constitutionally protected liberty interest, which protects the right to reasonably safe conditions of confinement, freedom from unreasonable restraint, and minimally adequate training sufficient to ensure these liberty interests. In a unanimous de...
متن کاملCompetent Authorities to Handle Complaints about Incorrect Tax Assessment and Collection with an Ethical Approach in Iran
Background: Retrial is an additional combination of the words "retrial" and "trial". Trial is a means of justice and trial, like others, is in the introduction of error and error if there is a verdict that is accompanied by error as a result of the trial. Which must be reconsidered. In the relations between taxpayers and the tax system, a dispute is possible, which can be due to factors such as...
متن کاملImpact of change in legal standard for those adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity 1975-1979.
In Michigan, during the middle of the last decade, a combination of new legislation and a state supreme court ruling significantly altered the definition of legal insanity and the disposition of those individuals that were adjudicated Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI). In early September 1974, the Michigan Supreme Court upheld a lower court's ruling in People v. McQuillan that found the s...
متن کامل